Richard Stallman vs. Canonical's CEO: 'Will Microsoft Love Linux to Death?'

' TechRepublic got different answers about Microsoft's new enthusiasm for Linux from Canonical's founder and CEO Mark Shuttleworth, and from Richard Stallman. Stallman "believes that Microsoft's decision to build a Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) amounts to an attempt to extinguish software that users are free to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve." "It certainly looks that way. But it won't be so easy to extinguish us, because our reasons for using and advancing free software are not limited to practical convenience," he said. "We want freedom. As a way to use computers in freedom, Windows is a non-starter..." Stallman remains adamant that the WSL can only help entrench the dominance of proprietary software like Windows, and undermine the use of free software. "That doesn't advance the cause of free software, not one bit," he says... "The aim of the free software movement is to free users from freedom-denying proprietary programs and systems, such as Windows. Making a non-free system, such Windows or MacOS or iOS or ChromeOS or Android, more convenient is a step backward in the campaign for freedom..." For Shuttleworth, Windows' embrace of GNU/Linux is a net positive for open-source software as a whole. "It's not like Microsoft is stealing our toys, it's more that we're sharing them with Microsoft in order to give everyone the best possible experience," he says. "WSL provides users who are well versed in the Windows environment with greater choice and flexibility, while also opening up a whole new potential user base for the open source platform..." Today Shuttleworth takes Microsoft's newfound enthusiasm for GNU/Linux at face value, and says the company has a different ethos to that of the 1990s, a fresh perspective that benefits Microsoft as much as it does open-source software. "Microsoft is a different company now, with a much more balanced view of open and competitive platforms on multiple fronts," he says. "They do a tremendous amount of engineering specifically to accommodate open platforms like Ubuntu on Azure and Hyper-V, and this work is being done in that spirit." The article also points out that Microsoft "does seem to be laying the groundwork for WSL to extend what's possible using a single GNU/Linux distro today, for instance, letting the user chain together commands from different GNU/Linux distros with those from Windows."' -- source: https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/09/24/2132218 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, NZ +64 (7) 858-5174 http://www.cms.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:18:58 +1300, Peter Reutemann wrote:
'Stallman "believes that Microsoft's decision to build a Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) amounts to an attempt to extinguish software that users are free to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve."'
Whatever you might say about RMS as a person, he has rarely been wrong about this sort of thing. Having said that, I don’t think Microsoft has quite the sheer marketing power it used to have. It has very rarely been in such a position of playing catch-up, and in none of those previous instances that I recall has it been in that position for long. Whereas when you look at its competitiveness vis-à-vis Linux and Open Source, its complacency goes back decades, and its realization of the situation has been very slow and grudging. As an example, look at its attempts to port PowerShell to Linux, which haven’t exactly been a big success <https://list.waikato.ac.nz/pipermail/wlug/2016-August/014394.html>. Overall, it still can’t get the hang of this whole command-line thing <https://list.waikato.ac.nz/pipermail/wlug/2015-June/013590.html>.
participants (2)
-
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
-
Peter Reutemann