Some may not have seen this, presumably by now as seen on TV and across the web. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11970391/Internet...
Some may not have seen this, presumably by now as seen on TV and across the web.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11970391/Internet...
What a load of BS: "Ministers have no plans to ban encryption services because they have an important role in the protection of legitimate online activity such as banking and personal data." If encryption can be broken, it is pointless. It is merely obfuscation. Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, NZ +64 (7) 858-5174 http://www.cms.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/
In other news politicians have banned random numbers greater than 1 million and some special digits of pi. Legislating their way into irrelevancy is what stupid people do. On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 02:13 -0500, Ian Young wrote:
Some may not have seen this, presumably by now as seen on TV and across the web.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11970391/Internet... _______________________________________________ wlug mailing list | wlug(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
participants (3)
-
gb -
Ian Young -
Peter Reutemann