Linux Foundation Survey Shows Companies Desperate To Hire Open-Source Talent

'ZDNet reports: At the Open Source Summit in Seattle, The Linux Foundation, and edX, the leading massive open online course (MOOC) provider released the 2021 Open Source Jobs Report. In this survey of 200 technical hiring managers and 750 open-source pros, the organizations found more demand for top open-source workers than ever. On top of that, 92% of managers are having trouble finding enough talent and many of them are also having fits holding on to their existing senior open-source staffers. In short, if you've got open-source skills, whether you're a developer, a sysadmin, a DevOps expert, or a cloud-native pro, there's a good-paying job waiting for you out there. And, where before the Covid-19 pandemic, you might have been stuck with only jobs in your area, these days, thanks to the rise of working from home, you can still live at the old homestead instead of moving to Silicon Valley or Manhattan. On top of this 50% of employers surveyed stated they are increasing hires this year. The jobs are out there. The difficulty for companies is, as 92% of managers report, finding enough talent and hanging onto existing talent in the face of fierce competition. This is especially true for cloud-native application development and operations skills. Cloud-native tops the list of skills needed with over 46% of hiring managers looking for people with Kubernetes smarts. Indeed, for the first time in the survey's history, cloud and container technology skills are more in demand by hiring managers than Linux. Indeed, cloud and container skills rank far above Linux in this go around with 41% over 32%. [T]he survey also found that DevOps has become the standard method for developing software: Virtually all open-source professionals (88%) report using DevOps practices in their work, a 50% increase from three years ago. In other words, it's all DevOps all the time. "The survey also revealed that a majority of employers, 88%, now say that hiring certified professionals is a priority," the report adds. "That's an 87% increase in only three years, 57% in 2020, and 47% in 2018." Sadly, discrimination has also become more of an issue. "18% of open-source professionals now report they have been discriminated against or made to feel unwelcome in the community," the report says. "That's a 125% increase over the past three years."' -- source: https://news.slashdot.org/story/21/09/20/2031215 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, NZ +64 (7) 858-5174 (office) +64 (7) 577-5304 (home office) http://www.cms.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 13:50:52 +1200, Peter Reutemann quoted:
'On top of this 50% of employers surveyed stated they are increasing hires this year. The jobs are out there. The difficulty for companies is, as 92% of managers report, finding enough talent and hanging onto existing talent in the face of fierce competition.'
And, as a counterpoint to that, how about the cluelessness of one reader comment on this article <https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/14/java_17/> on the question of whether Kotlin might not be a better bet than Java: Outside of the niche of Android-centric development, the two are not interchangeable. This is particularly the case if you work for an organisation that takes risk and liability seriously, where signing up to run your business on a language entirely owned and run for-profit by a fairly opaque, minor Czech IDE developer is really not the smartest of ideas. The second Google decide to move onto yet another language for Android there's a serious risk the whole ecosystem dies off. As Wolfgang Pauli said, “That’s not right; it’s not even wrong”. Where do you start countering the unspoken (and wrong) assumptions in that? It’s all predicated on the completely mistaken idea that an open-source product can be “owned” by some person or company, in the same sense that a proprietary one can.
participants (2)
-
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
-
Peter Reutemann