Bitbucket Dropping Support For Mercurial

'Bitbucket, once one of the largest Mercurial repository hosting sites, said Tuesday it plans to remove Mercurial features and repositories from its platform on June 1, 2020. In a blog post, Bitbucket wrote: As we surpass 10 million registered users on the platform, we're at a point in our growth where we are conducting a deeper evaluation of the market and how we can best support our users going forward. After much consideration, we've decided to remove Mercurial support from Bitbucket Cloud and its API. Bitbucket will stop letting users create new Mercurial repositories starting February 1, 2020, and start removing all the Mercurial repositories four months later. So you will want to backup your repositories and switch to a different platform in the coming months. A different user pointed out, "Another shitty aspect of bitbucket dropping mercurial support and deleting all the old repositories in 2020: all yt pull request discussions from before 2017 are going to be deleted. There's valuable context for how the code got written in those discussions." Several users have expressed their concerns over this decision. Sebastien Jodogne, CSO at Osimis, said, "This is an extremely concerning decision that endangers diversity in the computer science industry by pushing the de facto hegemony of git." For those of you affected by this, you can consider a number of platforms including SourceForge to host and manage your repositories. ' -- source: https://developers.slashdot.org/story/19/08/20/1654253 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, NZ +64 (7) 858-5174 http://www.cms.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:05:23 +1200, Peter Reutemann quoted:
'Bitbucket, once one of the largest Mercurial repository hosting sites, said Tuesday it plans to remove Mercurial features and repositories from its platform on June 1, 2020.'
Was it really that long ago it was posting blog entries <https://www.atlassian.com/blog/software-teams/mercurial-vs-git-why-mercurial> on how Mercurial was so much better than Git? (Link found from this article <https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/08/21/bitbucket_mercurial_repositories/> which manages to include a relevant limerick in its subhead.)
'"Another [poor] aspect of bitbucket dropping mercurial support and deleting all the old repositories in 2020: all yt pull request discussions from before 2017 are going to be deleted. There's valuable context for how the code got written in those discussions."'
Which is why I am really not keen on incorporating GitHubisms into my own repos, just for example.
'For those of you affected by this, you can consider a number of platforms including SourceForge to host and manage your repositories.'
When somebody is suggesting that SourceForge might be a better option, does that count as a low blow? ;)
participants (2)
-
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
-
Peter Reutemann