OSnews Decries 'The Mass Extinction of Unix Workstations'

'Anyone remember the high-end commercial UNIX workstations from a few decades ago — like from companies like IBM, DEC, SGI, and Sun Microsystems? Today OSnews looked back — but also explored what happens when you try to buy one today> : As x86 became ever more powerful and versatile, and with the rise of Linux as a capable UNIX replacement and the adoption of the NT-based versions of Windows, the days of the UNIX workstations were numbered. A few years into the new millennium, virtually all traditional UNIX vendors had ended production of their workstations and in some cases even their associated architectures, with a lacklustre collective effort to move over to Intel's Itanium — which didn't exactly go anywhere and is now nothing more than a sour footnote in computing history. Approaching roughly 2010, all the UNIX workstations had disappeared.... and by now, they're all pretty much dead (save for Solaris). Users and industries moved on to x86 on the hardware side, and Linux, Windows, and in some cases, Mac OS X on the software side.... Over the past few years, I have come to learn that If you want to get into buying, using, and learning from UNIX workstations today, you'll run into various problems which can roughly be filed into three main categories: hardware availability, operating system availability, and third party software availability. Their article details their own attempts to buy one over the years, ultimately concluding the experience "left me bitter and frustrated that so much knowledge — in the form of documentation, software, tutorials, drivers, and so on — is disappearing before our very eyes." Shortsightedness and disinterest in their own heritage by corporations, big and small, is destroying entire swaths of software, and as more years pass by, it will get ever harder to get any of these things back up and running.... As for all the third-party software — well, I'm afraid it's too late for that already. Chasing down the rightsholders is already an incredibly difficult task, and even if you do find them, they are probably not interested in helping you, and even if by some miracle they are, they most likely no longer even have the ability to generate the required licenses or release versions with the licensing ripped out. Stuff like Pro/ENGINEER and SoftWindows for UNIX are most likely gone forever.... Software is dying off at an alarming rate, and I fear there's no turning the tide of this mass extinction. The article also wonders why companies like HPE don't just "dump some ISO files" onto an FTP server, along with patch depots and documentation. "This stuff has no commercial value, they're not losing any sales, and it will barely affect their bottom line.' -- source: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/12/12/0116206 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, NZ Mobile +64 22 190 2375 https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:38:16 +1300, Peter Reutemann quoted:
'Anyone remember the high-end commercial UNIX workstations from a few decades ago — like from companies like IBM, DEC, SGI, and Sun Microsystems?'
What was it that made them “workstations” as distinct from “highly-specced PCs”? To me, it was the fact that they offered both client-style and server-style functionality in a single box. Microsoft killed off this market with Windows NT. But their “NT Workstation” desktop product was carefully crippled to avoid offering any serious server-style functionality; for that you had to pay extra (a lot extra) for “NT Server”. Somehow the customers were persuaded to accept this deal, moving to a less-functional desktop platform for less money up front, to discover that the costs for growing the system had moved elsewhere. Perhaps this was because the proprietary Unix vendors themselves were doing something similar, since they were also selling proper server machines, so they didn’t want their own workstation products to cannibalize _too_ much of this market segment. If you look at it this way, you realize that Linux is very much a full-function “workstation” OS, not a “desktop” OS. If you want to talk about “Linux on the desktop”, forget it: think about “Linux on the workstation” instead, and you realize that it completely owns that market.
participants (2)
-
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
-
Peter Reutemann