ESA’s Mars Express Orbiter Is 18 Years Old

<https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/02/mars_express/> In some industries, you really have to take the long view about your computing infrastructure: Wood recently shared a Twitter thread that began, much to the delight of retro-computing fans, with the recovery of data from two IDE drives from a long-dead PC and (spoiler alert) ended with the 25-year-old emulator for the Star Tracker software firing up on a 486-based machine running Windows for Workgroups 3.11 (after more modern Microsoft operating systems rejected it.) ... Alternatively, hardware on Earth could give up the ghost. The mission control systems for Mars Express originally ran on Solaris 8 machines (and some tools ran on Solaris 6.) A migration to Solaris 10 occurred in 2013 although, with a hat-tip to the Unix team working around failing ancient hardware, Wood observed: "We have Solaris 10, running a Solaris 8 zone and that zone is configured in Solaris 6 compatibility mode. (it really is turtles all the way down!)" Virtualization efforts have played their part in reducing the reliance on hard-to-obtain components. Should ESA keep the funding tap turned on and extend the mission past the end of 2022, an upgrade to Solaris 11 servers is also on the cards (a joint activity with other ESA missions XMM and Integral) that should last until the end of Mars Express.

I quoted:
A migration to Solaris 10 occurred in 2013 although, with a hat-tip to the Unix team working around failing ancient hardware, Wood observed: "We have Solaris 10, running a Solaris 8 zone and that zone is configured in Solaris 6 compatibility mode. (it really is turtles all the way down!)"
Interestingly, according to the chart here <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Solaris>, there was never a “Solaris 6”. There is not even a “SunOS 6”.

Interestingly, according to the chart here <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Solaris>, there was never a “Solaris 6”. There is not even a “SunOS 6”.
If I recall correctly, the 2.x series where generally referred to by the point number - hence 2.6 was referred to as "6" Cheers, Warren.
participants (2)
-
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
-
Warren Boyd