This backflip from Microsoft <https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/21/microsoft_azure_iot_central/> retracting an earlier announcement that seemingly undermined a major part of its “Internet-of-Things” efforts seems to do little to clear the confusion. I found this part of the report quite revealing: The insider also pointed out that vendors struggle to produce value for organizations developing and deploying IoT applications. While the industry underestimated the scale of the challenge in connecting thousands of sensors, each of which could generate 86,400 values per day, it also failed to form a commercial model that worked for everyone. Vendors were focused only on owning the platform and were reluctant to build applications on anyone else's, creating a stalemate, the insider said. Meanwhile, the “maker” movement continues on its merry way, building its applications and toolkits on (and for) open-source platforms like the Raspberry Pi and Arduino, while completely failing to spend billions of dollars on proprietary products. And the proprietary companies can do nothing but search desperately for some lever that will give them that valuable vendor lock-in, but all they can achieve is wrestle each other to a stalemate. Me, I consider that a win-win situation. ;)