It is commonly accepted that ISPs should not generally be held liable for things done by their customers--or indeed, anybody else’s customers over their pipes. This is currently the case in Australia, for example. But should protections be extended to what we might describe as “secondary” service providers--such as social media sites like Facebook, and of course Google? Seems like Australia agrees the answer should be mostly “yes”, but not for those specific companies. Not sure how they are going to decide who is eligible for such legal protections and who is not. <https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20171207/09383538762/mpaa-wins-australia-to-carve-google-facebook-out-expanded-safe-harbor-provisions.shtml>