[Administrivia] WLUG Committee Mailing List

One of the points of order raised at the last WLUG Committee meeting regarded the wlug-committee mailing list. For those of you who aren't aware of the current situation, the wlug-committee mailing list is a moderated mailing list available for the commitee members to discuss committee business. As such, only committee members can post. However, in the interests of open policy, and not least because we are a group concerned with open standards and discussions, the wlug-committee mailing list available for read-only access for general paid-up LUG members. However, it is important that anyone who wishes to read the wlug-committee mailing list understands a few points: * You are allowed to read the list, but you are not given write access. This is primarily because you have elected the committee to act on your behalf, and it is up to the committee to make the decisions. If you feel strongly about something you may forward your point to any committee member, who may act upon it. This does not mean they will raise your point immediately, nor does it mean they will forward your email direct to the wlug-committee list. * The list is there for the purpose of committee discussions. As such, the committee needs to be able to have candid discussions. * Once a final decision is made, the committee may inform the rest of the LUG if appropriate. However, until the committee has committed to a decision, you have no permission to act upon it. * If the committee wishes to ask for general input on a point, then it is up to the committee to do so. We have decided to keep the wlug-committee mailing list the way it is for now, despite some recent events which have lead, it seems, a great deal of confusion in external groups to the LUG. Had the above guidelines been understood beforehand, this would not have happened. It is important to us that if you choose to read the wlug-committee mailing list, you adhere to the above guidelines. We don't want to have to close the list to non-committee members completely. Daniel El Presidente :)

daniel(a)meta.net.nz wrote:
* The list is there for the purpose of committee discussions. As such, the committee needs to be able to have candid discussions.
Well summarised Dan. Just a point that I think REALLY needs to be spelled out, as people love to complain... Candid discussions may include all sorts of crap you might consider "unprofessional", or "inappropriate", to use the favourite PC buzzwords of the day. Tough. Basically, the list is our alternative to a private irc channel, and we don't want to have to think about everything we post. We just want to communicate. If you don't like it, just harden up. Complaints will go to /dev/null. G.
participants (2)
-
daniel@meta.net.nz
-
Greig McGill