
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~cmoman/Scan3845.pdf The above pdf is scan of the output I get having configured CUPS on my linux box to print to a Kyocera printer. It appears to me that the printer is not interpreting the PostScript test file as Postscript and is instead interpreting and printing the text within the file. The printer is connected to a local lan and most people print to it via Windows XP computers via a Windows server. I am using KDE with CUPS and have successfully printed to a brother colour laser using IPP and the PPD file from the Brother website. I am using the PPD file from the Kyocera file and linuxprinting.org says the Kyocera is supported perfectly. The Kyocera doesn't appear to use IPP but can be seen as a network printer or via SAMBA but I am not sure if this makes a difference.
From what I have described is a solution obvious?
Thanks

On 8/23/06, Chris O'Halloran <cmoman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~cmoman/Scan3845.pdf
The above pdf is scan of the output I get having configured CUPS on my linux box to print to a Kyocera printer.
It appears to me that the printer is not interpreting the PostScript test file as Postscript and is instead interpreting and printing the text within the file.
The printer is connected to a local lan and most people print to it via Windows XP computers via a Windows server.
I am using KDE with CUPS and have successfully printed to a brother colour laser using IPP and the PPD file from the Brother website.
I am using the PPD file from the Kyocera file and linuxprinting.org says the Kyocera is supported perfectly. The Kyocera doesn't appear to use IPP but can be seen as a network printer or via SAMBA but I am not sure if this makes a difference.
From what I have described is a solution obvious?
Just wondering (I'm not an expert!) ... with a HP Jet Direct printer on a network, you print to port 9100 for Postscript. Is it the same for Kyocera? Michael

Michael McDonald wrote:
On 8/23/06, Chris O'Halloran <cmoman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~cmoman/Scan3845.pdf
The above pdf is scan of the output I get having configured CUPS on my linux box to print to a Kyocera printer.
It appears to me that the printer is not interpreting the PostScript test file as Postscript and is instead interpreting and printing the text within the file.
The printer is connected to a local lan and most people print to it via Windows XP computers via a Windows server.
I am using KDE with CUPS and have successfully printed to a brother colour laser using IPP and the PPD file from the Brother website.
I am using the PPD file from the Kyocera file and linuxprinting.org says the Kyocera is supported perfectly. The Kyocera doesn't appear to use IPP but can be seen as a network printer or via SAMBA but I am not sure if this makes a difference.
From what I have described is a solution obvious?
Just wondering (I'm not an expert!) ... with a HP Jet Direct printer on a network, you print to port 9100 for Postscript. Is it the same for Kyocera?
Michael
Yes you are correct, there is in fact 9100 - 9108(?) available for different configs on the Kyocera IB print systems. For certain reasons PS is called KPDL on these. I unfortunately forgot to put knoppix in my tool case today, so was unable to have a look at your problem with CUPS. If things are quiet on monday I will have a fiddle with it. The other thing you could check is that it is set to auto emulate and not forced to a PCL mode. jono!! P.S. Hamilton amateur radio club market day this saturday at claudelands events center.

Thanks for the suggestions and the offer to help. The following page shows the Emulation setting page on the Kycoera printer http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~cmoman/FS-9500DN.png I changed the Network emulation from PCL to AUTO (KPDL was another option but I didn't want to stuff up other people printing) and now the test page prints perfectly. I live close to the printer so if other people's jobs get stuffed up by the AUTO setting I'll hear about it and then I can change it back. Thanks again for the tip on KPDL. Cheers Chris On 24/08/06, Paul Jonassen <jonassen(a)ihug.co.nz> wrote:
Michael McDonald wrote:
On 8/23/06, Chris O'Halloran <cmoman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~cmoman/Scan3845.pdf
The above pdf is scan of the output I get having configured CUPS on my linux box to print to a Kyocera printer.
It appears to me that the printer is not interpreting the PostScript test file as Postscript and is instead interpreting and printing the text within the file.
The printer is connected to a local lan and most people print to it via Windows XP computers via a Windows server.
I am using KDE with CUPS and have successfully printed to a brother colour laser using IPP and the PPD file from the Brother website.
I am using the PPD file from the Kyocera file and linuxprinting.org says the Kyocera is supported perfectly. The Kyocera doesn't appear to use IPP but can be seen as a network printer or via SAMBA but I am not sure if this makes a difference.
From what I have described is a solution obvious?
Just wondering (I'm not an expert!) ... with a HP Jet Direct printer on a network, you print to port 9100 for Postscript. Is it the same for Kyocera?
Michael
Yes you are correct, there is in fact 9100 - 9108(?) available for different configs on the Kyocera IB print systems. For certain reasons PS is called KPDL on these.
I unfortunately forgot to put knoppix in my tool case today, so was unable to have a look at your problem with CUPS. If things are quiet on monday I will have a fiddle with it. The other thing you could check is that it is set to auto emulate and not forced to a PCL mode.
jono!!
P.S. Hamilton amateur radio club market day this saturday at claudelands events center.
_______________________________________________ wlug mailing list | wlug(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
participants (3)
-
Chris O'Halloran
-
Michael McDonald
-
Paul Jonassen