Refuse To Be Terrorized

I have written up some thoughts about those horrible happenings in Christchurch today. You can read them here <https://default-cube.deviantart.com/journal/Refuse-To-Be-Terrorized-ChristchurchMosqueShooting-789676666>. I hope we learn the right lessons from others who have been here before us, and not repeat too many of their mistakes.

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 21:10:46 +1300, I wrote:
I hope we learn the right lessons from others who have been here before us, and not repeat too many of their mistakes.
And here goes one of them <https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12216367>: If our spies were able to carry out mass surveillance, would the alleged mosque murderer have been stopped? It's a question raised by National leader Simon Bridges and one which has been dismissed by those with expertise in security intelligence. But that’s not stopping him from saying: "But we can say with the significantly heightened risks we face today than we realised, it would make us safer." At least some people realize that merely collecting more information isn’t really very helpful. Dr Rhys Ball, formerly of the NZSIS, says: "If you want to, you can collect everything that is in the aether tomorrow if you were going to invest the resource to do so ... The downside is, how do you process that? I'm not aware of the Batcomputer being invented yet." Nice to see a fairly evenhanded report on the issue, that does not uncritically assume that surveilling people en masse will catch the crims.

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 21:10:46 +1300, I wrote:
I hope we learn the right lessons from others who have been here before us, and not repeat too many of their mistakes.
Another example would seem to be the banning of the shooter’s manifesto. While bringing the hammer down on his live-streamed video of the shootings makes sense, extending the prohibition to a collection of written words, hateful and deluded as they may be, seems to me to be a step too far. Consider this article <https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/zealand-massacre-weaponisation-history-190322062222288.html>, which would appear to be a point-by-point rebuttal of his claims. Is it? I don’t know, and now it would be illegal for me to try to find out. And no journalist in New Zealand would be permitted to write such an article.
participants (1)
-
Lawrence D'Oliveiro