What the GNOME Desktop Gets Right and KDE Gets Wrong

'Eric Griffith at Phoronix has provided a fresh perspective on the KDE vs. GNOME desktop debate after exclusively using GNOME for the past week while being a longtime KDE user. He concluded his five-page editorial (which raises some valid points throughout) by saying, "Gnome feels like a product. It feels like a singular experience. When you use it, it feels like it is complete and that everything you need is at your fingertips. It feels like the Linux desktop. ... In KDE, it's just some random-looking window popup that any application could have created. ... KDE doesn't feel like cohesive experience. KDE doesn't feel like it has a direction its moving in, it doesn't feel like a full experience. KDE feels like its a bunch of pieces that are moving in a bunch of different directions, that just happen to have a shared toolkit beneath them." However, with the week over and despite his criticism, he's back to using KDE.' -- source: http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/07/13/1548237 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, NZ +64 (7) 858-5174 http://www.cms.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

People spend too much time agonizing over GUIs, frankly. The old saying “a picture is worth a thousand words” has a flipside: GUIs are supposed to be easy to pick up, but if you have to train people to use them, trying to explain which parts to click on can get very time-consuming and confusing. Case in point: <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/11/what_do_you_mean_click_on_the_thing_which_looks_like_a_mondrian/>
participants (2)
-
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
-
Peter Reutemann