Nominations for officers of the committee
Hi All, Just a reminder request for nominations for next years committee. At present, I am the only person nominated for any role. I'm not sure that a committee of 1 is a very good idea. So have a think about it and get your names in for the officers and general positions on the committee to run the WLUG next year. A lot of people have said that they know where the WLUG should be headed and how it should be run. it's time to put your money down and step up! J -- James Pluck PalmOS Ergo Sum "Dear IRS: I would like to cancel my subscription. Please remove my name from your mailing list..."
James Pluck wrote:
Just a reminder request for nominations for next years committee. At present, I am the only person nominated for any role. I'm not sure that a committee of 1 is a very good idea.
ahhhhh, yeah, I'll own up to being available for a committee role again. ("... and for my sins they gave me one") errrr, volunteering lessens the odds of being strongarmed into an officer position, right? -right-? butting
Bryce Utting wrote:
James Pluck wrote:
Just a reminder request for nominations for next years committee. At present, I am the only person nominated for any role. I'm not sure that a committee of 1 is a very good idea.
ahhhhh, yeah, I'll own up to being available for a committee role again.
("... and for my sins they gave me one")
errrr, volunteering lessens the odds of being strongarmed into an officer position, right? -right-?
Thanks Bryce. Can you make sure to update the AGM wiki page to show your nomination and for which position/s you are standing? J
I'll stand for the general committee again. Don't know why last time we elected only 3 general committee members, when there were more willing. I took a look at the charter, and it doesn't seem to specify the number of general committee members we can have. I think including the officers a general committee of 5-6 would be fine, and help when planning things like software freedom day. Or create a sub-committee just for sfd maybe. Best, John James Pluck wrote:
Bryce Utting wrote:
James Pluck wrote:
Just a reminder request for nominations for next years committee. At present, I am the only person nominated for any role. I'm not sure that a committee of 1 is a very good idea.
ahhhhh, yeah, I'll own up to being available for a committee role again.
("... and for my sins they gave me one")
errrr, volunteering lessens the odds of being strongarmed into an officer position, right? -right-?
Thanks Bryce. Can you make sure to update the AGM wiki page to show your nomination and for which position/s you are standing?
J _______________________________________________ wlug mailing list | wlug(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
John Billings wrote:
I'll stand for the general committee again. Don't know why last time we elected only 3 general committee members, when there were more willing. I took a look at the charter, and it doesn't seem to specify the number of general committee members we can have. I think including the officers a general committee of 5-6 would be fine, and help when planning things like software freedom day. Or create a sub-committee just for sfd maybe.
*Rule 7* The officers of the society shall consist of a president, vice-president, secretary, and treasurer. The committee of the society shall include the above named officers, as well as 3 (three) extra members. This was dropped from the 5 that were originally required due to difficulties in getting quorum with 9 committee members.
James Pluck wrote:
Bryce Utting wrote:
James Pluck wrote:
Just a reminder request for nominations for next years committee. At present, I am the only person nominated for any role. I'm not sure that a committee of 1 is a very good idea.
I will stand for committee again.
Roderick Aldridge
participants (5)
-
Bryce Utting -
Daniel Lawson -
James Pluck -
John Billings -
Roderick Aldridge