
23 Jul
2015
23 Jul
'15
2:43 a.m.
<http://lwn.net/Articles/650816/> What impresses me about this is, even though the Debian package maintainer is also a libav developer, he “...in the end, could not bring himself to say that he was sure libav was the better choice.” With regard to the commit statistics, it seems like much of the activity in FFmpeg commits is wholesale copying of code from libav. But so what? If sticking with FFmpeg gives you the best of both worlds, why bother separately including packages for libav at all?
3568
Age (days ago)
3568
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Lawrence D'Oliveiro