On 22 February 2013 16:21, mailinglist <mailinglist(a)blahdeblah.co.nz> wrote:
he he, finally got the link through that I wanted to share. Any one at the Uni realise how agressive the present spam filters are?
Yes, we do. The list server uses Postini to do spam detection, but leaves it up to Mailman to make discard and moderate decisions, so you can make it a bit less aggressive by tweaking the header rules in each list's spam filters section. -- Colin Palmer <colinp(a)waikato.ac.nz> Linux Architect, Systems and Development Team
Hello Colin, Thanks for the reply. Since I have access to the wlug admin interface, I have in the past, discarded or let through various emails flagged as spam. What I notice these days is no emails appear to captured and my emails to the list, unless replying to other people, never appear for moderation. This is why I was wondering if some upstream filtering was taken place by which emails were never even arriving at the wlug list for moderation. If you are sure it remains a setting for me to adjust (as the list adminstrator), I'd be grateful for a little guidance on where this configuration might be. Cheers, Chris On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:21:37 +1300, Colin Palmer wrote:
On 22 February 2013 16:21, mailinglist wrote:
he he, finally got the link through that I wanted to share. Any one at the Uni realise how agressive the present spam filters are?
Yes, we do.
The list server uses Postini to do spam detection, but leaves it up to Mailman to make discard and moderate decisions, so you can make it a bit less aggressive by tweaking the header rules in each list's spam filters section.
participants (2)
-
Colin Palmer -
mailinglist