What ? All of it ? But someone mentioned that there are bits of it over in Japan. Someone else mentioned that it was all over the show. That would have been a more recent assignment, I don't think APNIC even see Telecom as a big enough player to assign a full /8 block. Anyway, not my problem...
-----Original Message----- From: Drew Broadley [mailto:drew(a)corrupt.co.nz] Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2004 11:13 To: 'Waikato Linux Users Group' Subject: RE: [wlug] iptables question
Dunno... Who has that one ? Who knows, everything under my administrative control was in there, so I'm happy with it...
Xtra's Flatrate 256k Netblock.
_______________________________________________ wlug mailing list | wlug(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug
Lindsay Druett wrote:
What ? All of it ?
But someone mentioned that there are bits of it over in Japan. Someone else mentioned that it was all over the show. That would have been a more recent assignment, I don't think APNIC even see Telecom as a big enough player to assign a full /8 block.
They got assigned 222.152/16. I have one of these addresses on my home DSL and I can't get to various portions of the internet, can be quite annoying. Philip Murray Systems Engineer - Open2view.com webmaster(a)open2view.com
I don't think APNIC even see Telecom as a big enough player to assign
a full /8 block.
Last I saw they were a medium membership holder.
Surely they would "care" about that sized customer ?
- Drew
Apologies, "Very Large" http://www.apnic.net/apnic-bin/memlist.pl?size=Very%20Large&cc=NZ&sort=r andom - Drew
participants (3)
-
Drew Broadley -
Lindsay Druett -
Philip Murray