Thought there already was a 100-gigabit-per-second Ethernet spec. But it seems that still isn’t quite practical enough (cost? range?) for common use. Nor is the 40-gigabit-per-second fallback. So here we have two more lesser specs: <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/31/25g_and_50g_ethernet_spec_finalised/>.
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:42:38 +1300, I wrote:
Thought there already was a 100-gigabit-per-second Ethernet spec. But it seems that still isn’t quite practical enough (cost? range?) for common use. Nor is the 40-gigabit-per-second fallback. So here we have two more lesser specs:
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/31/25g_and_50g_ethernet_spec_finalised/>.
Trevor Pott tries to make sense of it all: <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/06/decoding_25gb_ethernet_and_beyond/>.
participants (1)
-
Lawrence D'Oliveiro