On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:54:29 +1300, Peter Reutemann quoted:
'As part of the Apple Lisa's 40th birthday celebrations, the Computer History Museum has released the source code for Lisa OS version 3.1 under an Apple Academic License Agreement.'
Don’t call it “open source” (as the article does). I hate it when these people think “open source” is a desirable, snazzy-sounding brand they can just stick on anything. There is an official definition for the term <https://opensource.org/osd>. In particular, note article 6: The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research. So, no such thing as “non-commercial/personal/research use only”.