My sincerest apologies for not trimming. It slipped my mind. Could someone explain why top-posting is bad? I've been doing it all along and only now had anyone comment. Perhaps you should have some kind of article called "READ THIS BEFORE POSTING TO THE LIST LEST DANIEL RIP YOUR BALLS OFF". If I'd bottom-posted on that last message I sent, no would probably probably have noticed I wrote anything. What's wrong with having a descending chronological order? Does it bung up someone's fifteen year old mail reader again? Is it a problem for the digest? Blazes people, clarify the rules or something. Craig Box wrote:
I guess that counts for something...
Isomer's power user test:
Requoting an ENTIRE TEN PAGE MESSAGE with your reply counts for 5 points off, I'm afraid.
(So does not changing your topic ;)