6 Jul
2017
6 Jul
'17
3:39 a.m.
On Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:07:19 +1200, gb wrote:
My suspicion is that systemd is riddled with spooky coders contributing 'bugs' that act conveniently as backdoors for enabling eavesdropping or even covert remote execution. But plausibly deniable of course, (now you can deny it).
Is that spelled out clearly enough for you?
What is the basis for your suspicion? Remember systemd is open source, you are free to inspect it for “backdoors” or whatever. Who are these “spooky coders”?
Contributing compromised code to open source projects is a well-known tactic ...
[Citation needed]
The fact that systemd was intent on getting into every corner of the linux OS ...
How do you think it succeeded in winning over supporters? Brainwashing?