Well, I assumed it went without saying that no one would run a production server on anything other than stable... Clearly not. Assume any ref. to "Debian" from me is actually referring to "Debian stable (woody)". G. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Le Vaillant" <jfl2(a)myrealbox.com> To: "Waikato Linux Users Group" <wlug(a)list.waikato.ac.nz> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 1:33 PM Subject: Re: [wlug] [Fwd: End of Life for Red Hat Linux 9]
Kyle Carter wrote:
id love to use debian if it wasnt so last year (if not even older) maybe this is my chance to find something else.
Now, hang on. When we talk about "debian", do we mean stable, testing or unstable?
Other distros seem comparable to unstable, as opposed to stable, where packages are tested for months (or years) before inclusion.
_______________________________________________ wlug mailing list | wlug(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug