On 07/01/2018 14:50, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 14:06:08 +1300, Wolf wrote:
Sorry, Michael, you have not, because of what you have hidden from your argument - data conversion rules if you restrict the argument to smallish numbers only ... There was no such restriction in his argument. Remember, you were the one who tried to make an argument based on infinite sets, he demonstrated the fallacy in that argument.
My original post contains just one mention each of the words finite" and "infinite". To quote: "The rub is that in order to exclude membership from a set that set has to be finite. If the set is made infinite by allowing recursion, membership can no longer be ascertained, as proven by e.g. Gödel's incompleteness theorems." If you lack the honesty to admit you made a mistake, shut up. If you do, admit to it. wolf