On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Bruce Kingsbury <zcat@zcat.geek.nz> wrote:

The original restriction was put in place so that someone with an
agenda against FLOSS can pull the kind of committee-stacking that
other organisations (eg the ISO) have since turned out to be
vulnerable to, and we're suggesting something that still restricts
this. But at the moment we have distressingly few paid up members and
I'm not sure what we do if we can't reach a quorum at the AGM.

I looked into the whole issue previously with the charter and was satisfied that the current arrangement was fine.

To me a lack of a quorom indicates interest has been lost in the WLUG. That means it needs to be reinvogorated or allowed to die and some other body will advocate for open source if it is worthwhile (which I think it is).

--
Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/, http://www.jandi.co.nz
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz