Re: [wlug] what does a good e-mail client need ?

Michael McDonald wrote:

I'm not an expert in Outlook, but reading the article I can see the sort of thing that's being referred to. It's not email per se, but the groupware side that's lacking. One example - the ability to schedule a meeting at a time when all particpants are free and then put it in their calendars - all without the participants having to do anything.

Afaik, Outlook is able to do this.

Centralised address lists, public folders etc are other examples.

Centralized address lists are supported; I'm not sure about public folders.