Not sure what your trying to do. Adding lots of swap isn't going to help performance, swap is a bottleneck. Or are you benchmarking or something? John Narender wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Narender <narender.hooda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I have done a lot of research, but I do not have any real world experience so I'm hoping you can help me understand the real world differences in performance. The research tells me that if you create a swap file on an empty disk and on a OS using kernel 2.6 then the performance differences are minor, but that the swap partition is a slight favorite in terms of pure performance. Our Scenario:
Raid 1 146GB partition 33GB Swap File created on / (Note: the swap file was created when the OS was built, so the hard drives were not full and they were very empty) Kernel 2.6
Best Regards N
Could someone please guide me over this, which one is good.
Best Regards N _______________________________________________ wlug mailing list | wlug(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Unsubscribe: http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug