- wlug - list.wlug.org.nz

Windows Server Forgets What Time It Is
by Lawrence D'Oliveiro 17 Aug '23

17 Aug '23

Seems that, some years ago, Microsoft added a “feature” to Windows Server, called “Secure Time Seeding”. This was supposed to offer alternative ways for a server machine to keep track of the correct time, in the event of failures in the more usual mechanisms. Unfortunately, this “feature” only seems to have introduced a new source of problems, where the server can suddenly throw its date and time setting off by as much as several months, often with unfortunate consequences for the applications running on it <https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/08/windows-feature-that-resets-system…>. At this stage, Microsoft is still in the “no comment” stage of (not) responding to this problem. Reports of issues go right back to the introduction of the feature, back in 2016. They may only be happening intermittently, but it seems to me this is still enough to damage what trust there may still be left in Microsoft’s product.

1 0

Firefox Finally Outperforming Google Chrome In SunSpider
by Peter Reutemann 16 Aug '23

16 Aug '23

'Michael Larabel writes via Phoronix: Mozilla developers are celebrating that they are now faster than Google Chrome with the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark, although that test has been superseded by the JetStream benchmark. Last week a new Firefox Nightly News was published that outlines that "We're now apparently beating Chrome on the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark!" The provided numbers now show Firefox easily beating Chrome in this decade-old JavaScript benchmark. The benchmarks come from AreWeFastYet.com. Meanwhile for the newer and more demanding JetStream 2.0 benchmark, Google Chrome continues to win easily over Firefox. ' -- source: https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/08/15/2015210 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, Hamilton, NZ Mobile +64 22 190 2375 https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

1 0

From The “How Not To Design A Website” Department
by Lawrence D'Oliveiro 15 Aug '23

15 Aug '23

Found a link to some past news items on this site reporting on Munich city’s back-and-forth migrations between Linux and Windows. The last linked item was this <https://www.ip-watch.org/2018/06/12/former-munich-mayor-warns-negative-effe…>. Bad enough that that light, thin text is almost unreadable against a similarly-coloured background, I decided to search the site for “munich” to see if I could find a more recent item, and got this: <https://www.ip-watch.org/?s=munich>. In case they fix it later, the top part has this message: Deprecated: strlen(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/clients/5bc716f64eaa5eb2ef6cc74a6b9b690a/web/weblog/wp-content/plugins/wordfence/vendor/wordfence/wf-waf/src/lib/utils.php on line 445 and at the bottom it says “Not found, error 404” and that the page I am looking for (search results??) no longer exists. Who knew? Mind you, PHP is the only language where features can be marked “no longer deprecated” in later releases, so who knows, perhaps they will later decide to assign a meaning to finding the length of a string when the string isn’t actually a string ...

1 0

Should There Be an 'Official' Version of Linux?
by C. A. Fillekes 15 Aug '23

15 Aug '23

I was surprised, a couple years ago, to find that most of my gnome desktop applications had ceased being exportable to different machines' displays over the network. Even Firefox. Ordinary vanilla X11 is unwieldy, but it at least had that one key feature, and has had it since well before MS Windows ruined everything.

1 0

Should There Be an 'Official' Version of Linux?
by Peter Reutemann 14 Aug '23

14 Aug '23

'Why aren't more people using Linux on the desktop? Slashdot reader technology_dude shares one solution: Jack Wallen at ZDNet says establishing an "official" version of Linux may (or may not) help Linux on the desktop increase the number of users, mostly as someplace to point new users. It makes sense to me. What does Slashdot think and what would be the challenges, other than acceptance of a particular flavor? Wallen argues this would also create a standard for hardware and software vendors to target, which "could equate to even more software and hardware being made available to Linux." (And an "official" Linux might also be more appealing to business users.) Wallen suggests it be "maintained and controlled by a collective of people from users, developers, and corporations (such as Intel and AMD) with a vested interest in the success of this project... There would also be corporate backing for things like marketing (such as TV commercials)." He also suggests basing it on Debian, and supporting both Snap and Flatpak... In comments on the original submission, long-time Slashdot reader bobbomo points instead to kernel.org, arguing "There already is an official version of Linux called mainline. Everything else is backports." And jd (Slashdot user #1,658) believes that the official Linux is the Linux Standard Base. "All distributions, more-or-less, conform to the LSB, which gives you a pseudo 'official' Linux. About the one variable is the package manager. And there are ways to work around that." Unfortunately, according to Wikipedia... The LSB standard stopped being updated in 2015 and current Linux distributions do not adhere to or offer it; however, the lsb_release command is sometimes still available.[citation needed] On February 7, 2023, a former maintainer of the LSB wrote, "The LSB project is essentially abandoned." That post (on the lsb-discuss mailing list) argues the LSB approach was "partially superseded" by Snaps and Flatpaks (for application portability and stability). And of course, long-time Slashdot user menkhaura shares the obligatory XKCD comic... It's not exactly the same thing, but days after ZDNet's article, CIQ, Oracle, and SUSE announced the Open Enterprise Linux Association, a new collaborative trade association to foster "the development of distributions compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux." So where does that leave us? Share your own thoughts in the comments. And should there be an "official" version of Linux?' -- source: https://linux.slashdot.org/story/23/08/12/1835204 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, Hamilton, NZ Mobile +64 22 190 2375 https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

3 2

Does Desktop Linux Have a Firefox Problem?
by Peter Reutemann 14 Aug '23

14 Aug '23

'OS News' managing editor calls Firefox "the single most important desktop Linux application," shipping in most distros (with some users later opting for a post-installation download of Chrome). But "I'm genuinely worried about the state of browsers on Linux, and the future of Firefox on Linux in particular..." While both GNOME and KDE nominally invest in their own two browsers, GNOME Web and Falkon, their uptake is limited and releases few and far between. For instance, none of the major Linux distributions ship GNOME Web as their default browser, and it lacks many of the features users come to expect from a browser. Falkon, meanwhile, is updated only sporadically, often going years between releases. Worse yet, Falkon uses Chromium through QtWebEngine, and GNOME Web uses WebKit (which are updated separately from the browser, so browser releases are not always a solid metric!), so both are dependent on the goodwill of two of the most ruthless corporations in the world, Google and Apple respectively. Even Firefox itself, even though it's clearly the browser of choice of distributions and Linux users alike, does not consider Linux a first-tier platform. Firefox is first and foremost a Windows browser, followed by macOS second, and Linux third. The love the Linux world has for Firefox is not reciprocated by Mozilla in the same way, and this shows in various places where issues fixed and addressed on the Windows side are ignored on the Linux side for years or longer. The best and most visible example of that is hardware video acceleration. This feature has been a default part of the Windows version since forever, but it wasn't enabled by default for Linux until Firefox 115, released only in early July 2023. Even then, the feature is only enabled by default for users of Intel graphics — AMD and Nvidia users need not apply. This lack of video acceleration was — and for AMD and Nvidia users, still is — a major contributing factor to Linux battery life on laptops taking a serious hit compared to their Windows counterparts... It's not just hardware accelerated video decoding. Gesture support has taken much longer to arrive on the Linux version than it did on the Windows version — things like using swipes to go back and forward, or pinch to zoom on images... I don't see anyone talking about this problem, or planning for the eventual possible demise of Firefox, what that would mean for the Linux desktop, and how it can be avoided or mitigated. In an ideal world, the major stakeholders of the Linux desktop — KDE, GNOME, the various major distributions — would get together and seriously consider a plan of action. The best possible solution, in my view, would be to fork one of the major browser engines (or pick one and significantly invest in it), and modify this engine and tailor it specifically for the Linux desktop. Stop living off the scraps and leftovers thrown across the fence from Windows and macOS browser makers, and focus entirely on making a browser engine that is optimised fully for Linux, its graphics stack, and its desktops. Have the major stakeholders work together on a Linux-first — or even Linux-only — browser engine, leaving the graphical front-end to the various toolkits and desktop environments.... I think it's highly irresponsible of the various prominent players in the desktop Linux community, from GNOME to KDE, from Ubuntu to Fedora, to seemingly have absolutely zero contingency plans for when Firefox enshittifies or dies...' -- source: https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/08/13/226217 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, Hamilton, NZ Mobile +64 22 190 2375 https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

2 1

Mozilla To Bring Firefox Desktop Extension To Android Browser
by Peter Reutemann 12 Aug '23

12 Aug '23

'Scott DeVaney, writing at Mozilla blog: In the coming months Mozilla will launch support for an open ecosystem of extensions on Firefox for Android on addons.mozilla.org (AMO). We'll announce a definite launch date in early September, but it's safe to expect a roll-out before the year's end. Here's everything developers need to know to get their Firefox desktop extensions ready for Android usage and discoverability on AMO. For the past few years Firefox for Android officially supported a small subset of extensions while we focused our efforts on strengthening core Firefox for Android functionality and understanding the unique needs of mobile browser users. Today, Mozilla has built the infrastructure necessary to support an open extension ecosystem on Firefox for Android. We anticipate considerable user demand for more extensions on Firefox for Android, so why not start optimizing your desktop extension for mobile-use right away?' -- source: https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/08/11/1234201 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, Hamilton, NZ Mobile +64 22 190 2375 https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

2 1

'The Open Source Licensing War is Over'
by Peter Reutemann 12 Aug '23

12 Aug '23

'It's time for the open source Rambos to stop fighting and agree that developers care more about software's access and ease of use than the purity of its license, reads a piece on InfoWorld. From the report: The open source war is over, however much some want to continue soldiering on. Recently Meta (Facebook) released Llama 2, a powerful large language model (LLM) with more than 70 billion parameters. In the past, Meta had restricted use of its LLMs to research purposes, but with Llama 2, Meta opened it up; the only restriction is that it can't be used for commercial purposes. Only a handful of companies have the computational horsepower to deploy it at scale (Google, Amazon, and very, very few others). This means, of course, it's not "open source" according to the Open Source Definition (OSD), despite Meta advertising it as such. This has a few open source advocates crying, Rambo style, "They drew first blood!" and "Nothing is over! Nothing! You just don't turn it off!", insistent that Meta stop calling Llama 2 "open source." They're right, in a pedantic sort of way, but they also don't seem to realize just how irrelevant their concerns are. For years developers have been voting with their GitHub repositories to pick "open enough." It's not that open source doesn't matter, but rather it has never mattered in the way some hoped or believed. More than 10 years ago, the trend toward permissive licensing was so pronounced that RedMonk analyst James Governor declared, "Younger [developers] today are about POSS -- post open source software. [Screw] the license and governance, just commit to GitHub." In response, people in the comments fretted and scolded, saying past trends like this had resulted in "epic clusterf-s" or that "promiscuous sharing w/out a license leads to software-transmitted diseases." And yet, millions of unlicensed GitHub repositories later, we haven't entered the dark ages of software licensing. Open source, or "open enough," software now finds its way into pretty much all software, however it ends up being licensed to the end user. Ideal? Perhaps not. But a fact of life? Yep. In response, GitHub and others have devised ways to entice developers to pick open source licenses to govern their projects. As I wrote back in 2014, all these moves will likely help, but the reality is that they also won't matter. They won't matter because "open source" doesn't really matter anymore. Not as some countercultural raging against the corporate software machine, anyway. All of this led me to conclude we're in the midst of the post-open source revolution, a revolution in which software matters more than ever, but its licensing matters less and less.' -- source: https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/08/11/1221250 Cheers, Peter -- Peter Reutemann Dept. of Computer Science University of Waikato, Hamilton, NZ Mobile +64 22 190 2375 https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~fracpete/ http://www.data-mining.co.nz/

2 1

The Eternal Sunshine Of The SEO-Focused Site
by Lawrence D'Oliveiro 11 Aug '23

11 Aug '23

This report <https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/08/the-internet-is-not-…> says that CNET, and possibly other large sites, are deleting online archives of decades-old articles in an effort to improve their rankings with search engines like Google. Google, on the other hand, is saying that such behaviour makes no difference to their rankings. I found the closing paragraph particularly interesting: From time immemorial, the protection of historical content has required making many copies without authorization, regardless of the cultural or business forces at play, and that has not changed with the Internet. Archivists operate in a parallel IP universe, borrowing scraps of reality and keeping them safe until shortsighted business decisions and copyright protectionism die down. Hopefully, despite the link rot, future historians can piece together an accurate history of our fragile digital era. In there is a link to this item from the same author <https://www.technologizer.com/2012/01/23/why-history-needs-software-piracy/>, from over a decade ago, on “Why History Needs Software Piracy”: When viewed in a historical context, the benefits of software piracy far outweigh its short-term costs. If you care about the history of technology, in fact, you should be thankful that people copy software without permission.

1 0

Abuses Of AI #397: Pak’N’Save’s Savey-Meal Bot Goes Off The Rails
by Lawrence D'Oliveiro 11 Aug '23

11 Aug '23

I wonder whose bright idea it was to offer an AI-powered recipe advisor that offered free-text input <https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/11/supermarket_reins_in_ai_recipebot/>. So naturally somebody tried entering such hazardous ingredients as ammonia and bleach, to see if the bot would make up a recipe from them. Which it did. Complete with glowing recommendations like “the perfect non-alcoholic beverage to quench your thirst and refresh your senses. It combines the invigorating scents of ammonia, bleach, and water for a truly unique experience!" It has since been revised to be a bit more, ah, conservative with its suggestions, and also only allow selection from a limited list of ingredients. Though a reader suggests that the list restriction is only implemented within the HTML page itself, not in the actual back end.

1 0